I feel ashamed posting this, but #10 on Yahoo. Not sure why I’m 10 on Yahoo, and I’ve moved from 13 to 12 and back on Google, but does it matter? I get these things from my referrer stats, honest! You can insist on my quest for search engine domination by linking to me with the Matt. Slight variations like “Matt Mullenweg,” “photo matt,” “I love Matt,” and “Matt is a _____ (fill in blank)” should be alright as well.
Possibly related posts:
- SEO Book Interview A new interview with Aaron Wall of SEO Book up....
- Pimping Firefox Tim Ferriss writes Pimping Firefox: The Basics (Matt Mullenweg, Garrett...
- Facebook Fan If you’re a Facebook user and a reader of this...
- Theme Directory Interview Matt Mullenweg & Joseph Scott Discuss The WordPress Themes Directory. ¶...
- Broken Kindle My Kindle is quite broken, not sure how it happened,...
Matt Mullenweg is one of PC World’s Top 50 People on the Web, Inc.com’s 30 under 30, and Business Week’s 25 Most Influential People on the Web. 
josh | April 26th, 2003 @ 1:35 am |
it should me “matt is (a[n]) ________, because matt is a conceited is just bad grammar.
Matt | April 26th, 2003 @ 6:58 pm |
Grammer schmammer. Talk to Becca about that stuff.
SarahC | April 26th, 2003 @ 8:22 pm |
“Matt is a dork” link, coming right up
Christine | April 28th, 2003 @ 12:35 am |
#1 for Christine! Mwuhahahah! I rule my name! Sorry you have to be up against Matt’s Script Archive, but #12 is GREAT!
Rebecca | April 28th, 2003 @ 8:44 am |
Spelling schmelling– First, I say that Josh is just being too nitpicky and I don’t care to edit this entry and second, you spelled “grammar” wrong in your comment, Mr. Mullenweg.
Matt | April 28th, 2003 @ 9:32 am |
Editing can do delightfully ironic things.
Rebecca | April 29th, 2003 @ 12:18 am |
Hey! I caught that, you dork!
P.S. Well, what do you know, editing can do some “delightfully ironic things.”
Matt | April 29th, 2003 @ 2:27 pm |
For anyone totally confused now, there is an “edit war” going on with various mispellings both true and created in the various comments. This is what happens when Good Editors Go Bad, next on Fox…