<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Licensing matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ma.tt/2004/05/licensing-matters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ma.tt/2004/05/licensing-matters/</link>
	<description>Unlucky in Cards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 13:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta4-20941</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2004/05/licensing-matters/#comment-4492</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 17:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2004/05/20/licensing-matters/#comment-4492</guid>
		<description>Mark, granted.

Scott, you probably use software with much worse licenses than that every day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, granted.</p>
<p>Scott, you probably use software with much worse licenses than that every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Johnson</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2004/05/licensing-matters/#comment-4490</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 16:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2004/05/20/licensing-matters/#comment-4490</guid>
		<description>Gosh, when Phil puts it into perspective, 6A begins to look like (*shudder*) Microsoft!  I hope they get these issues clarified ASAP.  Nobody in their right mind would want to purchase software with a license like that.  I have nothing against that company and have no problem with buying their software, but I won&#039;t use software with such an insane license.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, when Phil puts it into perspective, 6A begins to look like (*shudder*) Microsoft!  I hope they get these issues clarified ASAP.  Nobody in their right mind would want to purchase software with a license like that.  I have nothing against that company and have no problem with buying their software, but I won&#8217;t use software with such an insane license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2004/05/licensing-matters/#comment-4489</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 13:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2004/05/20/licensing-matters/#comment-4489</guid>
		<description>Actually, the GPL is pretty complex around the edges.  But it&#039;s relatively well-understood by now, since it hasn&#039;t changed in 13 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the GPL is pretty complex around the edges.  But it&#8217;s relatively well-understood by now, since it hasn&#8217;t changed in 13 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

