Is WebMonkey back? Does it matter?
¶
5 Responses
Share your thoughts
Matt Mullenweg is one of PC World’s Top 50 People on the Web, Inc.com’s 30 under 30, and Business Week’s 25 Most Influential People on the Web. More »
You should follow me on twitter here.
Recent Essays
Projects
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- More...

andrew | June 22nd, 2004 @ 8:18 pm |
Yep. Nope.
mwarden | June 22nd, 2004 @ 10:38 pm |
No.
However, that is the most immortal monkey I have ever seen.
I do believe one must stab it with a wooden stake to keep it from regenerating.
And they said wood was obsolete!
Colin D. Devroe | June 23rd, 2004 @ 7:27 am |
My feelings are the same, I really never took use to WebMonkey and frankly now that I’ve gone there and read a few articles, will most likely never return there either.
Pete Hopkins | June 23rd, 2004 @ 12:46 pm |
I think that the idea of it being back is more important than it actually being back. They haven’t had many useful articles since 1999 or so, but they were so important in the Early Days (TM) that it feels good to have them still around. Never did warm up to the most recent redesign, though.
Adam M. | July 1st, 2004 @ 9:47 am |
I’m with Pete on this. Webmonkey was essential to getting me started on HTML and JavaScript back in the day, but I haven’t seen anything of interest on their site in a very long time.