Comments on: Mike on URIs http://ma.tt/2004/08/mike-on-uris/ Unlucky in Cards Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:53:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19904 By: Raena http://ma.tt/2004/08/mike-on-uris/#comment-6358 Raena Sat, 07 Aug 2004 03:54:15 +0000 http://photomatt.net/2004/08/04/mike-on-uris/#comment-6358 'However without a message explaining the redirection like he has I could see where that behaviour could be confusing.' No kidding. It shat me for weeks until I finally got off my bum and found the relevant code, which I blogged (poorly) here: http://blog.raena.net/entries/2004/08/06/wphack/ ‘However without a message explaining the redirection like he has I could see where that behaviour could be confusing.’

No kidding. It shat me for weeks until I finally got off my bum and found the relevant code, which I blogged (poorly) here:
http://blog.raena.net/entries/2004/08/06/wphack/

]]> By: Mike M http://ma.tt/2004/08/mike-on-uris/#comment-6355 Mike M Fri, 06 Aug 2004 14:40:45 +0000 http://photomatt.net/2004/08/04/mike-on-uris/#comment-6355 Like any standard way of doing something, it'll change eventually. Why not consciously choose an identifier to indicate a version of your url structure. For example: v1/archive/2004/08/06/url_versioning or archive1/2004/08/06/url_versioning The intent being to provide a logical unique key such as 'v1' or 'archive1' where the sole purpose is to identify the url structure that follows the key. Like any standard way of doing something, it’ll change eventually. Why not consciously choose an identifier to indicate a version of your url structure. For example:

v1/archive/2004/08/06/url_versioning

or

archive1/2004/08/06/url_versioning

The intent being to provide a logical unique key such as ‘v1′ or ‘archive1′ where the sole purpose is to identify the url structure that follows the key.

]]>