<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apache Playboy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ma.tt/2004/09/apache-playboy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ma.tt/2004/09/apache-playboy/</link>
	<description>Unlucky in Cards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:53:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19904</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2004/09/apache-playboy/#comment-7544</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2004/09/18/apache-playboy/#comment-7544</guid>
		<description>See also: http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/archives/2004/08/15/000996.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See also: <a href="http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/archives/2004/08/15/000996.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/archives/2004/08/15/000996.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinah</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2004/09/apache-playboy/#comment-7521</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2004/09/18/apache-playboy/#comment-7521</guid>
		<description>I used to subscribe to Playboy, actually. The rest of the magazine around the pictures of naked women was (and I presume still is) excellent. Their coverage of 1st Amendment rights has always been particularly strong. It doesn&#039;t surprise me to see them backing open source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to subscribe to Playboy, actually. The rest of the magazine around the pictures of naked women was (and I presume still is) excellent. Their coverage of 1st Amendment rights has always been particularly strong. It doesn&#8217;t surprise me to see them backing open source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominik</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2004/09/apache-playboy/#comment-7514</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2004/09/18/apache-playboy/#comment-7514</guid>
		<description>You should get them to host WP..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should get them to host WP..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2004/09/apache-playboy/#comment-7508</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2004 01:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2004/09/18/apache-playboy/#comment-7508</guid>
		<description>Or in Playboy&#039;s case, medical technology, Photoshop, and women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or in Playboy&#8217;s case, medical technology, Photoshop, and women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2004/09/apache-playboy/#comment-7507</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2004 01:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2004/09/18/apache-playboy/#comment-7507</guid>
		<description>Women and technology is an unbeatable mix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women and technology is an unbeatable mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

