31 Comments

  • Oskar Syahbana May 27, 2006 @ 7:15 pm

    It works well from here. Maybe there have been a little hiccup on their network? It happens sometimes

  • Matt May 27, 2006 @ 8:38 pm

    The problem must be widespread, because I’ve tried proxying the requests through 7 machines in various datacenters.

  • Catnabbit May 27, 2006 @ 9:39 pm

    Works fine for me here as well.

  • Matt May 27, 2006 @ 10:26 pm

    Wait, so when you guys click the first link in the post, you see results? It doesn’t give you this?

    We did not find results for “inurl:yahoo.com search”.

  • Greg May 27, 2006 @ 10:47 pm

    It doesn’t work for me. I am getting:

    We did not find results for “inurl:yahoo.com search”.

  • david May 27, 2006 @ 11:31 pm

    I didn’t get any search results.

  • gslin May 27, 2006 @ 11:36 pm

    that link replies:

    1 – 100 of about 130,000,000 for inurl:yahoo.com search – 0.31 sec.

  • Adam May 28, 2006 @ 12:41 am

    Matt, I can confirm that yahoo is returning “We did not find any results” on my computer.

    This is from here in Australia, as well as proxied through a few datacentres in the US. Same result each time, regardless of the location.

  • BCSEEATI May 28, 2006 @ 12:45 am

    I got “We did not find results for inurl:yahoo.com search.”, too.

  • BCSEEATI May 28, 2006 @ 12:53 am

    But I tried on another machine, it works fine.

  • Paul Roberts May 28, 2006 @ 1:14 am

    both the Yahoo and Google links bring up search results for me.

  • Joe May 28, 2006 @ 1:17 am

    I get results for the first search link on yahoo: “1 – 10 of about 130,000,000 for inurl:yahoo.com search – 0.03 sec. “, with yahoo.com coming up as the first result.

  • Kyle May 28, 2006 @ 1:18 am

    Yep, I get results for the first link in the post. Maybe a bad yahoo datacenter that you kept getting routed to?

  • Computer Guru May 28, 2006 @ 1:50 am

    I don’t think they did, because it most certainly isn’t working here.
    I’m not a Yahooligan, but if you’re sure of the Syntax in that link then something is definitely up.

    There *are* many other search providers, some of them that even match Google’s black-box rack-mount servers that you can buy for an organization and some of these are open source, in keeping with the WordPress Spirit :)

    If you’re interested in switching or whatnot, drop me an email, and we’ll see what we can find.

    What sucks is you’re going to have to redo the entire WordPress.org site to match the new API for whatever product you choose, but I’m sure the brains at WordPress can figure out how to do it in as little time/effort/cost as possible.

  • Michael Heilemann May 28, 2006 @ 2:02 am

    I think I’ve said it before, but I’ll reiterate: Since Yahoo Search was implemented, with the combined results of both the codex, forums, blog and what not, I haven’t been able to find anything… If you keep with Yahoo, or a similar solution, I’d love to see an easy way of searching only a particular section of the WordPress network.

    PS: Yes, I know you can do searches for a particular URL, but that’s a hack at best, and something 99% of the users looking for help won’t know how to do, or like me, is too lazy to figure out the syntax for.

  • Alin May 28, 2006 @ 2:30 am

    Doesn’t work for me, I get “We did not find results for “inurl:yahoo.com search”.”

    Nothing for “inurl:yahoo.com news” either. Looks more like an intentional block from their side, rather than a bug

  • PaweÅ‚ GoÅ›cicki May 28, 2006 @ 3:27 am

    As I recall it, I’d always get “We couldn’t find anything! Please try a different search.” while using wordpress.org search. In fact I cannot remember a single time it has returned any results. These days I’m manually typing “site:wordpress.org” into Google. Works every time.

  • Matt May 28, 2006 @ 4:00 am

    Michael, you may not have checked out the search lately, but it gives you options about which section to search. It default to just the Codex, but allows support forums, trac, etc.

  • Jackie May 28, 2006 @ 6:42 am

    I got “We did not find results for “inurl:yahoo.com search”.”

  • stabani May 28, 2006 @ 8:29 am

    aah, I was wondering what the heck was wrong when I spent hours trying to search my way through the wordpress codex. I hope it gets better soon though. Doesn’t work down here either. Also, before this, everytime I tried to search from the search page, it used to break.

  • drmike May 28, 2006 @ 11:59 am

    Hey Matt. Are you sure you’re spelling WordPress right?

    heh heh heh :)

  • Mark Jaquith May 28, 2006 @ 1:07 pm

    Your example is broken, (domain in inurl:) but this works fine for me:

    site:wordpress.org inurl:support RSS

    Why not just use the site: operator to designate the domain, and then use inurl: to designate a subdirectory?

  • Matt May 28, 2006 @ 3:14 pm

    Mark, I’ll try that to bring the search back online quickly, thanks for the suggestion. What’s weird is that it just stopped working overnight.

  • marcoss May 28, 2006 @ 6:42 pm

    Actually the inurl: operator is not designed for that purpose, it is suppose to do a search in all the sites that contains the word that follows the : within the url.

    If what you want to do, is a search that is restricted to an specific domain you have to use the site: operator instead. Then you can combine it with inurl: to force the search to be a little more specific, so you have.

    site:matt.wordpress.com * for a search that is only restricted to the (sub)domain.

    site:matt.wordpress.com inurl:2006 * for a search that is also restricted to the (sub)domain but requires the word/number 2006 to be within the url.

  • Matt May 28, 2006 @ 7:19 pm

    We were using inurl: because Yahoo doesn’t allow you to put a full path in site: like Google does.

    Using site + inurl I’ve got the search working now again, hopefully for good. It’s bizarre that the linked search works for some folks but not for others.

  • Will May 29, 2006 @ 4:55 pm

    Your example returns zero results but search at wordpress.org works fine for me.

  • Jonathan June 2, 2006 @ 9:52 am

    How about ask.com? Been seeing a bunch of their commercials lately and thought I’d try it out.

  • jessie June 7, 2006 @ 6:48 pm

    Hey, have you guys looked at the new Google AJAX Search API? Its very cool! JSON under the covers but comes complete with a JavaScript API. Its popping up in lots of blogs and sites.

    http://googleajaxsearchapi.blogspot.com/

    http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxsearch/

  • Eric June 8, 2006 @ 5:16 pm

Share Your Thoughts