Jul
12
Filed under: Asides, Spam | July 12th, 2006

dot info

Some days don't you want to just blacklist all of .info? More spam there than anything else except maybe .com or .be, and certainly a higher percentage than any other top-level domain.

Possibly related posts:

  1. Cuil I like Cui
  2. Spam SEO Eliminatin
  3. NFL on WordPress The new NF

30 Responses

  • drmike | July 12th, 2006 @ 5:32 pm | Reply

    Agreed but I have too many clients of mine that use them. Heck, they’re still cheap. I can get renewals on them for two bucks with my registar for a year. I have a couple of hundred of them. Maybe someday I’ll actually use them.

  • Eddy Luten | July 12th, 2006 @ 5:48 pm | Reply

    True and sad, the TLD isn’t used for what it was created. Wouldn’t it be nice to have some kind of International Internet Law?

  • Kyle Korleski | July 12th, 2006 @ 6:05 pm | Reply

    You know, truer words were never spoken.

    Wait, haven’t you forgotten .ru?

  • Josh | July 12th, 2006 @ 6:06 pm | Reply

    I might have said:

    “…certainly a higher percentage than any other so-called top-level domain.”

  • Richard | July 12th, 2006 @ 6:16 pm | Reply

    I filter out .info sources in my PubSub feeds.

  • Ken Walker | July 12th, 2006 @ 6:58 pm | Reply

    Wow, that would really suck. If only I had known…

  • Patrick Havens | July 12th, 2006 @ 6:59 pm | Reply

    I will admit to owning a .info domain too (http://ivant.info) but it seems a lot of my spam is coming from .ru and .pl so I haven’t noticed huge amount from .info. I’ve been blocking most email from .kr for a while because of spam…

  • Scott | July 12th, 2006 @ 8:14 pm | Reply

    Can’t wait to get my .xxx domain finally regestered.

  • CarLBanks | July 12th, 2006 @ 8:44 pm | Reply

    My blog is on a .info domain…

  • Allen | July 12th, 2006 @ 9:45 pm | Reply

    I use a .be for my blog (which is not spam), but only because it’s free.

    I agree with Kyle about the .ru though.

  • Pujiono | July 12th, 2006 @ 10:00 pm | Reply

    I can get .INFO for free for every hosting package I bought. This is why most of .info are useless site. Sigh…

  • Domas | July 12th, 2006 @ 11:50 pm | Reply

    Heh, well, I thought I want to register one domain, then I found out that only .info from gTLDs was available, and somehow immediately I rejected the idea. Not because of any opinion on .info general content, but simply because it sucks. Who would ever want a website with .info attached? ;-)

  • Ajay D'Souza | July 13th, 2006 @ 12:10 am | Reply

    Blocking .info is not attacking the cause, but actually treating the symtoms.

  • Nico | July 13th, 2006 @ 1:20 am | Reply

    Really, .be? I’ve never noticed that. Being a Belgian citizen, living abroad, I think that’s quite funny, disturbing and bizarre at the same time.

  • Neil T. | July 13th, 2006 @ 1:31 am | Reply

    I own a .info domain (needssome.info) – it’s mostly just used for sites that I host on behalf of other people. I know that my email filters don’t look favourably on .info and .biz domains.

  • Paul | July 13th, 2006 @ 2:23 am | Reply

    I get a lot of comment spam for .info sites, but strangely enough most of my email spam comes from .biz. I wish spammers would be consistent across all mediums. :)

  • alex_t | July 13th, 2006 @ 3:14 am | Reply

    Kyle, .ru is a domain of country with several millions of valid users – you can’t compare it to .info (stupid marketing joke of domain).

  • Jason Hoffman | July 13th, 2006 @ 4:22 am | Reply

    In http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1744408,00.asp has “TextDrive took other steps besides blocking comments. Hoffman had noticed that the bulk of comment spam was coming from .info domains, so TextDrive for a short time blocked all referrals to .info. Later, it created its own blacklist of .info sites to ban from sending comments to blogs.”

    So yes, sometimes.

  • senthilnathan | July 13th, 2006 @ 5:11 am | Reply

    This is all about my history.

  • Neville Hobson | July 13th, 2006 @ 6:44 am | Reply

    Most of the spam I see (in the stopped-by-Akismet list :) ) is from .ru and .pl domains. Yet to see any from .be. Oh, wait, there’s an invitation…

  • 59ideas | July 14th, 2006 @ 6:51 am | Reply

    .info is cheap and I believe .be and .ru are free?

    It is a pity that cheap domains end up as easy throwaways for spammers.

  • Jason Cosper | July 14th, 2006 @ 9:42 am | Reply

    *sigh* I hate that a bunch of jerks have to ruin things for the rest of us…

  • Nils | July 15th, 2006 @ 12:00 am | Reply

    Of course, by blocking .info, you just make it harder for the people (like me) who run a legitimate site on a .info domain. You shouldn’t block content based on TLD; that’s taking the easy way out. There needs to be a better solution.

  • Sourabh | July 15th, 2006 @ 4:36 pm | Reply

    I think it has a lot to do with the fact that these .info domains were very cheap before. Most domain registrars even offered a 1 .info domain free with a one top level domain and later on it costed equivalent to other tld domains.

    But agreed these domains are much of a nuisance and most of the spam on my site comes thru them :p

  • Mark Jaquith | July 17th, 2006 @ 3:46 am | Reply

    .biz and .info probably have the highest spam/ham ratio from what I’ve seen.

  • Nico | July 17th, 2006 @ 3:02 pm | Reply

    .be is free? That would be news to me! For those that don’t know, .be is the top-level domain for Belgium… I am willing to believe that some people see spam from .be (as from any other top-level domain), but I wouldn’t compare it to a commercial top-level domain such as .info…

  • Miraz Jordan | July 17th, 2006 @ 5:20 pm | Reply

    That’s extremely distressing. I have two perfectly legitimate sites on a .info domain – mainly because the .com domain name was already taken.

  • John Hoare | July 18th, 2006 @ 7:40 pm | Reply

    I have quite a few sites using .info.

    Why? Because the important thing about them is that they share *information*. They aren’t a company. They aren’t an organisation. They aren’t an ISP. The *information* is the important bit.

    So to answer the question above – “Who would ever want a website with .info attached?” – me. And it actually describes a hell of a lot of sites out there, that are using other TLDs. I wish it was used more often for good.

  • D'log | August 3rd, 2006 @ 5:14 pm | Reply

    I run a large WordPress blog on .info, 12,000+ unique visitors per month, been blogging on it regularly for years. For some reason it is difficult to get on the blog searches, but I recently e-mailed Sphere and they’ve added me on “by hand”. Apparently the default seearch-engine assumption is that anything on .info is rejected. Which is ridiculous, and shows the need for proper spidering, text-gathering and and evaluation.

  • Marc | September 8th, 2007 @ 11:35 am | Reply

    Well, I ran my blog on a .info site for several years, but now that my friend’s SpamAssasin flagged me for having a .info, that was the last straw and I just went and registered a .com domain.

Share your thoughts