<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloglines Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ma.tt/2006/09/bloglines-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ma.tt/2006/09/bloglines-update/</link>
	<description>Unlucky in Cards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 13:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta4-20941</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photo Matt &#187; Switching to Google Reader</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2006/09/bloglines-update/#comment-424350</link>
		<dc:creator>Photo Matt &#187; Switching to Google Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2006/09/29/bloglines-update/#comment-424350</guid>
		<description>[...] to follow a few dozen blogs, now I could consume hundreds and its UI just made sense to me, and just got better over time. I sang its praises often in interviews, mentioning it as one of the handful of websites I used [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to follow a few dozen blogs, now I could consume hundreds and its UI just made sense to me, and just got better over time. I sang its praises often in interviews, mentioning it as one of the handful of websites I used [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2006/09/bloglines-update/#comment-206568</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 23:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2006/09/29/bloglines-update/#comment-206568</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been giving web-based aggregators a try since friday.

Started with Netvibes. Slick UI but slow-slow-slow for updates.

Tried to import my feeds to Google Reader and it didn&#039;t work.

Now using Bloglines. UI is much worse than Netvibes, but you can&#039;t beat the fact that it works and it&#039;s fast for updates... although there is a lag between when an update happens and when it propogates to Bloglines that can wreck havok if you&#039;re trying to get a first comment in on a website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been giving web-based aggregators a try since friday.</p>
<p>Started with Netvibes. Slick UI but slow-slow-slow for updates.</p>
<p>Tried to import my feeds to Google Reader and it didn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>Now using Bloglines. UI is much worse than Netvibes, but you can&#8217;t beat the fact that it works and it&#8217;s fast for updates&#8230; although there is a lag between when an update happens and when it propogates to Bloglines that can wreck havok if you&#8217;re trying to get a first comment in on a website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave M.</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2006/09/bloglines-update/#comment-204026</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2006/09/29/bloglines-update/#comment-204026</guid>
		<description>Z, your right. Google&#039;s Reader is much better than before. Light years better. I&#039;ve moved my feed list over there and am quite pleased with the way it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Z, your right. Google&#8217;s Reader is much better than before. Light years better. I&#8217;ve moved my feed list over there and am quite pleased with the way it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Tubbs</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2006/09/bloglines-update/#comment-203640</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Tubbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 00:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2006/09/29/bloglines-update/#comment-203640</guid>
		<description>Bloglines saves so much time, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll switch to Google Reader. I tried using it before the redesign, and it just isn&#039;t nearly as good. Bloglines has changed the way I read. I&#039;m much more informed now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloglines saves so much time, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll switch to Google Reader. I tried using it before the redesign, and it just isn&#8217;t nearly as good. Bloglines has changed the way I read. I&#8217;m much more informed now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2006/09/bloglines-update/#comment-203530</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2006/09/29/bloglines-update/#comment-203530</guid>
		<description>I agree. It&#039;s funny, about a month ago, I tried to switch back to a desktop aggregator on my mac, having used bloglines for years and netnewswire before that. I couldn&#039;t do it. The new enhancements are subtle, but very helpful. Tip o&#039; the hat to the bloglines team. I&#039;m not going anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. It&#8217;s funny, about a month ago, I tried to switch back to a desktop aggregator on my mac, having used bloglines for years and netnewswire before that. I couldn&#8217;t do it. The new enhancements are subtle, but very helpful. Tip o&#8217; the hat to the bloglines team. I&#8217;m not going anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2006/09/bloglines-update/#comment-203363</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2006/09/29/bloglines-update/#comment-203363</guid>
		<description>The new Google Reader revamp makes it very similar to bloglines.  They&#039;re basically the same now, though I&#039;ve switched to Google Reader for now just because the interface seems a little more slick.  I&#039;d recommend giving it a try.  The original Google Reader was HORRIBLE, but this redesign did an excellent good job of making it usable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new Google Reader revamp makes it very similar to bloglines.  They&#8217;re basically the same now, though I&#8217;ve switched to Google Reader for now just because the interface seems a little more slick.  I&#8217;d recommend giving it a try.  The original Google Reader was HORRIBLE, but this redesign did an excellent good job of making it usable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave M.</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2006/09/bloglines-update/#comment-203348</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2006/09/29/bloglines-update/#comment-203348</guid>
		<description>I used to use Bloglines. I started not long after they opened up. At the time, I thought they were great. They added great features and there really wasn&#039;t a better way to keep up with sites no matter where you were.

Then Ask.com bought them. I thought, OK, maybe this is a good thing...

Nope, Bloglines is buggy. The &quot;Keep new&quot; feature seems to work sometimes and others the flagged posts seem to be lost forever.

So I see this post, and think: &quot;Well, maybe they have cleaned up their act.&quot; So I updated my feeds there and let Bloglines start gobbling posts. An hour later, I hope back to the site to check out what&#039;s new. I click on a folder to see the posts of the sites that are in that folder. The &quot;new&quot; count goes away or decrements but no posts. I click again, the new count goes down again. Click, count drops off completely. Click one last time... Now all the posts that were new appear. :blink: I go to another new posts folder and click. The new count goes away but no posts. Click again and get the posts.

This is a new behavior that Bloglines never did before. So, once again, I&#039;m back to NetNewsWire and desktop readers until something that works and works well comes out... :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to use Bloglines. I started not long after they opened up. At the time, I thought they were great. They added great features and there really wasn&#8217;t a better way to keep up with sites no matter where you were.</p>
<p>Then Ask.com bought them. I thought, OK, maybe this is a good thing&#8230;</p>
<p>Nope, Bloglines is buggy. The &#8220;Keep new&#8221; feature seems to work sometimes and others the flagged posts seem to be lost forever.</p>
<p>So I see this post, and think: &#8220;Well, maybe they have cleaned up their act.&#8221; So I updated my feeds there and let Bloglines start gobbling posts. An hour later, I hope back to the site to check out what&#8217;s new. I click on a folder to see the posts of the sites that are in that folder. The &#8220;new&#8221; count goes away or decrements but no posts. I click again, the new count goes down again. Click, count drops off completely. Click one last time&#8230; Now all the posts that were new appear. :blink: I go to another new posts folder and click. The new count goes away but no posts. Click again and get the posts.</p>
<p>This is a new behavior that Bloglines never did before. So, once again, I&#8217;m back to NetNewsWire and desktop readers until something that works and works well comes out&#8230; <img src='http://s.ma.tt/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2006/09/bloglines-update/#comment-203305</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2006/09/29/bloglines-update/#comment-203305</guid>
		<description>I must agree on the love for bloglines. I especially like the (vim-like) hotkey navigation. This makes my daily feed reading whizz past with minimal hand motion. And the support is great too. I recently requested a hotkey to toggle the &#039;Keep new&#039; status on the current message, and a few weeks later I suddenly noticed that they had silently added the &#039;n&#039; key :-D 

A big thumbs up for bloglines!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must agree on the love for bloglines. I especially like the (vim-like) hotkey navigation. This makes my daily feed reading whizz past with minimal hand motion. And the support is great too. I recently requested a hotkey to toggle the &#8216;Keep new&#8217; status on the current message, and a few weeks later I suddenly noticed that they had silently added the &#8216;n&#8217; key <img src='http://s.ma.tt/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>A big thumbs up for bloglines!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danithew</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2006/09/bloglines-update/#comment-203226</link>
		<dc:creator>danithew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2006/09/29/bloglines-update/#comment-203226</guid>
		<description>The recent changes in Bloglines were subtle and yet very noticeable (in a good way) at the same time.  Everything just looked clearer and nicer.  I use Bloglines every day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent changes in Bloglines were subtle and yet very noticeable (in a good way) at the same time.  Everything just looked clearer and nicer.  I use Bloglines every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2006/09/bloglines-update/#comment-203165</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2006/09/29/bloglines-update/#comment-203165</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more, love the new enhancements...Bloglines feels much quicker and more responsive now.  Great example of a subtle use of AJAX to truly improve usability, rather than just doing it because you can.  I sent the Bloglines dev team a kudos comment congratulating them on their great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more, love the new enhancements&#8230;Bloglines feels much quicker and more responsive now.  Great example of a subtle use of AJAX to truly improve usability, rather than just doing it because you can.  I sent the Bloglines dev team a kudos comment congratulating them on their great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2006/09/bloglines-update/#comment-203151</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2006/09/29/bloglines-update/#comment-203151</guid>
		<description>I was never able to get into the Google reader, but I haven&#039;t played with the redesign much.

One of the things I liked about Blogline&#039;s updates is that they didn&#039;t try to redo everything under the sun, like most folks do in a redesign. They just chose one element that people interact with a great deal, and made a logical and functional iteration on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was never able to get into the Google reader, but I haven&#8217;t played with the redesign much.</p>
<p>One of the things I liked about Blogline&#8217;s updates is that they didn&#8217;t try to redo everything under the sun, like most folks do in a redesign. They just chose one element that people interact with a great deal, and made a logical and functional iteration on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2006/09/bloglines-update/#comment-203139</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2006/09/29/bloglines-update/#comment-203139</guid>
		<description>The guys over at bloglines have pretty much always tried to keep things simple. I think that&#039;s a major key to their success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guys over at bloglines have pretty much always tried to keep things simple. I think that&#8217;s a major key to their success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2006/09/bloglines-update/#comment-203116</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2006/09/29/bloglines-update/#comment-203116</guid>
		<description>What about the new Google Reader?

I was pretty much ready to switch to Google Reader, but then Bloglines made some really nice tweaks yesterday. Now I am not sure which to use, I&#039;ll give it a few days of playing with both. I do know I have tried to switch many times before, but always came back to Bloglines. Only time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the new Google Reader?</p>
<p>I was pretty much ready to switch to Google Reader, but then Bloglines made some really nice tweaks yesterday. Now I am not sure which to use, I&#8217;ll give it a few days of playing with both. I do know I have tried to switch many times before, but always came back to Bloglines. Only time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

