<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: S3 News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/</link>
	<description>Unlucky in Cards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:53:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19904</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazon S3 Outage &#124; Robert Accettura&#8217;s Fun With Wordage</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-448500</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon S3 Outage &#124; Robert Accettura&#8217;s Fun With Wordage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 02:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-448500</guid>
		<description>[...] uses S3, but proxies that with Varnish. There&#8217;s a brief description here, and a more detailed breakdown here. According to Barry Abrahamson, WordPress.com does 1500 image [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] uses S3, but proxies that with Varnish. There&#8217;s a brief description here, and a more detailed breakdown here. According to Barry Abrahamson, WordPress.com does 1500 image [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazon AWS Outage &#171; Barry on WordPress</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-438844</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon AWS Outage &#171; Barry on WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-438844</guid>
		<description>[...] is significantly degraded this morning. This is the first significant outage since we started using S3 to serve images for WordPress.com. Currently we serve about 1500 image requests per second across [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is significantly degraded this morning. This is the first significant outage since we started using S3 to serve images for WordPress.com. Currently we serve about 1500 image requests per second across [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Giese</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-435533</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Giese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 20:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-435533</guid>
		<description>I think im going to rethink my plans on using s3 now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think im going to rethink my plans on using s3 now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why you should use WordPress.com &#171; The r-evolving web</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-434793</link>
		<dc:creator>Why you should use WordPress.com &#171; The r-evolving web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-434793</guid>
		<description>[...] under the water. The estate is spread across multiple datacentres, with your data distributed and backed up in Amazon S3. You don&#8217;t have to worry about any system upgrades, monitoring, intrusion detection or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] under the water. The estate is spread across multiple datacentres, with your data distributed and backed up in Amazon S3. You don&#8217;t have to worry about any system upgrades, monitoring, intrusion detection or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohamed Moshaya</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-430279</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohamed Moshaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 22:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-430279</guid>
		<description>I signed up with Amazon aws in October and uploaded my podcasts around the 20th of October. I was shocked to receive a bill of nearly $900 just for two weeks usage on 1st of november, I&#039;m doubtful that my lessons were downloaded or viewed nearly quarter of a million times. 

In the end, I learnt it the hard way, Amazon s3 is rubbish and i wouldn&#039;t recommend it to anyway. Reporting &amp; statistics is crap, customer service is not good (no telephone &amp; i emailed them twice and still didn&#039;t get a reply) Plus i don&#039;t think they protect against spam which i believe is the cause for the majority of bandwidth.

Guess i learnt the hard way, not to use pay as you go like S3. Unlimited bandwidth is the future. I had to delete all my files from s3 and shut the site temporarily. nearly caused me to go bankrupt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I signed up with Amazon aws in October and uploaded my podcasts around the 20th of October. I was shocked to receive a bill of nearly $900 just for two weeks usage on 1st of november, I&#8217;m doubtful that my lessons were downloaded or viewed nearly quarter of a million times. </p>
<p>In the end, I learnt it the hard way, Amazon s3 is rubbish and i wouldn&#8217;t recommend it to anyway. Reporting &amp; statistics is crap, customer service is not good (no telephone &amp; i emailed them twice and still didn&#8217;t get a reply) Plus i don&#8217;t think they protect against spam which i believe is the cause for the majority of bandwidth.</p>
<p>Guess i learnt the hard way, not to use pay as you go like S3. Unlimited bandwidth is the future. I had to delete all my files from s3 and shut the site temporarily. nearly caused me to go bankrupt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-429802</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-429802</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Paolo on being curious as to how you achieved this.

I&#039;d like to know more about the technical implementation, what plugins were used, code changes required and whether there are exceptions to the rule (are all WordPress static files also being stored on S3, etc).

Namely, if someone wanted to achieve the same where should they start and what pointers would you give?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Paolo on being curious as to how you achieved this.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to know more about the technical implementation, what plugins were used, code changes required and whether there are exceptions to the rule (are all WordPress static files also being stored on S3, etc).</p>
<p>Namely, if someone wanted to achieve the same where should they start and what pointers would you give?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-429311</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-429311</guid>
		<description>Good times...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good times&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links del dÃ­Â­a 14 Octubre 2007 &#187; sarelinks</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428623</link>
		<dc:creator>Links del dÃ­Â­a 14 Octubre 2007 &#187; sarelinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428623</guid>
		<description>[...] Photo Matt &#187; S3 News - Wordpress.com ha empezado a utilizar Amazon S3 como hosting principal (no s&#243;lo backup). Matt Mullenweg comenta que no reducir&#225;n costes (el ancho de banda de S3 es muy caro) pero que han ganado en flexibilidad y escalabilidad de su plataforma. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photo Matt &raquo; S3 News &#8211; WordPress.com ha empezado a utilizar Amazon S3 como hosting principal (no s&oacute;lo backup). Matt Mullenweg comenta que no reducir&aacute;n costes (el ancho de banda de S3 es muy caro) pero que han ganado en flexibilidad y escalabilidad de su plataforma. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luhmann</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428621</link>
		<dc:creator>Luhmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428621</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised you don&#039;t use Joyent&#039;s new accelerators. I thought you Wordpress folks had some kind of relationship with TextDrive/Joyent. They recently had a post about how their service is much cheaper than S3 for heavy-volume accounts like yours. You might want to do the math and compare, I bet you&#039;d save money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised you don&#8217;t use Joyent&#8217;s new accelerators. I thought you WordPress folks had some kind of relationship with TextDrive/Joyent. They recently had a post about how their service is much cheaper than S3 for heavy-volume accounts like yours. You might want to do the math and compare, I bet you&#8217;d save money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-10-13</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428605</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-10-13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428605</guid>
		<description>[...] Photo Matt Â» S3 News Interesting, wordpress.com is using S3 for all their storage now. $1500 is a decent hosting bill. Matt points out that S3 is cheap for storage but expensive for bandwidth. (tags: amazon aws wordpress s3 mattmullenweg wordpress.com hosting storage) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photo Matt Â» S3 News Interesting, wordpress.com is using S3 for all their storage now. $1500 is a decent hosting bill. Matt points out that S3 is cheap for storage but expensive for bandwidth. (tags: amazon aws wordpress s3 mattmullenweg wordpress.com hosting storage) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Around the web &#124; alexking.org</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428595</link>
		<dc:creator>Around the web &#124; alexking.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428595</guid>
		<description>[...] S3 News - pretty cool. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] S3 News &#8211; pretty cool. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links del dÃ­Â­a 10 Octubre 2007 &#187; sarelinks</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428393</link>
		<dc:creator>Links del dÃ­Â­a 10 Octubre 2007 &#187; sarelinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428393</guid>
		<description>[...] Photo Matt &#187; S3 News - Wordpress.com ha empezado a utilizar Amazon S3 como hosting principal (no s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photo Matt &raquo; S3 News &#8211; WordPress.com ha empezado a utilizar Amazon S3 como hosting principal (no s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-10-11 &#171; The Wayward Word Press</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428391</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-10-11 &#171; The Wayward Word Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 06:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428391</guid>
		<description>[...] Photo Matt Â» S3 News If S3 is good enough for Matt, it is good enough for me. I&#8217;m going to use it to back up Dave&#8217;s data. (tags: s3 amazon programming-tools photo-matt via:sogrady) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photo Matt Â» S3 News If S3 is good enough for Matt, it is good enough for me. I&#8217;m going to use it to back up Dave&#8217;s data. (tags: s3 amazon programming-tools photo-matt via:sogrady) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428381</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 02:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428381</guid>
		<description>If anyone&#039;s interested in using Amazon S3 with their own hosted version of WordPress, I have a plugin available to help do just that:

http://tantannoodles.com/toolkit/wordpress-s3/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone&#8217;s interested in using Amazon S3 with their own hosted version of WordPress, I have a plugin available to help do just that:</p>
<p><a href="http://tantannoodles.com/toolkit/wordpress-s3/" rel="nofollow">http://tantannoodles.com/toolkit/wordpress-s3/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Z</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428375</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428375</guid>
		<description>AWS is great for some things, but bandwidth is not one of them.  For high-bandwidth purposes you&#039;re generally much better off with something like serverbeach.com, or whatever other host you like who offers you 2 bazillion TB per month transfer for only $199 or whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWS is great for some things, but bandwidth is not one of them.  For high-bandwidth purposes you&#8217;re generally much better off with something like serverbeach.com, or whatever other host you like who offers you 2 bazillion TB per month transfer for only $199 or whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress.com using S3 &#171; Barry on WordPress</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428373</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress.com using S3 &#171; Barry on WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428373</guid>
		<description>[...] Almost forgot, but Matt reminded me, he has a really super duper awesome post about WordPress.com and S3 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Almost forgot, but Matt reminded me, he has a really super duper awesome post about WordPress.com and S3 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: so-you-wanna-see-an-image at CodeWord: Apokalyptik</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428371</link>
		<dc:creator>so-you-wanna-see-an-image at CodeWord: Apokalyptik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428371</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve been asked how we manage serving files from Amazons very cool S3 service at WordPress.com&#8230; This is how. (covering a requested image already stored on S3, not the upload -&gt; s3 process) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;ve been asked how we manage serving files from Amazons very cool S3 service at WordPress.com&#8230; This is how. (covering a requested image already stored on S3, not the upload -&gt; s3 process) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428350</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428350</guid>
		<description>Well on the server costs side, we&#039;ve gone from 1 server per datacenter costing 2010/mo total to 4 cache servers per datacenter costing 2236/mo total, plus the S3 cost which looks like it&#039;s going to be about 2700 this month, so net it&#039;s going to be about 3k a month more expensive.

However we no longer worry about storage capacity on the file servers, we have way more redundancy and I/O in each datacenter (for hot files) with no complicated cross-datacenter failovers, and maintaining the cache servers is easy. They&#039;re quickly interchangeable. I feel that overall user file serving, which is a pretty crucial part of our service, is overall more reliable. I&#039;d feel more comfortable doing things that increase storage usage now.

So right now it&#039;s costing more than double what things used to cost, and is slower for uncached files, but I think as we tweak the caching we&#039;ll get a higher hit rate and get the bandwidth cost down, which is 95% of our S3 cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well on the server costs side, we&#8217;ve gone from 1 server per datacenter costing 2010/mo total to 4 cache servers per datacenter costing 2236/mo total, plus the S3 cost which looks like it&#8217;s going to be about 2700 this month, so net it&#8217;s going to be about 3k a month more expensive.</p>
<p>However we no longer worry about storage capacity on the file servers, we have way more redundancy and I/O in each datacenter (for hot files) with no complicated cross-datacenter failovers, and maintaining the cache servers is easy. They&#8217;re quickly interchangeable. I feel that overall user file serving, which is a pretty crucial part of our service, is overall more reliable. I&#8217;d feel more comfortable doing things that increase storage usage now.</p>
<p>So right now it&#8217;s costing more than double what things used to cost, and is slower for uncached files, but I think as we tweak the caching we&#8217;ll get a higher hit rate and get the bandwidth cost down, which is 95% of our S3 cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paolo/Pixline</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428344</link>
		<dc:creator>Paolo/Pixline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428344</guid>
		<description>I wonder how you guys managed to have S3 working as primary storage.. some well crafted plugins, some hyperdb-like magic, or something else?

We was thinking about S3 as our new primary storage server (we are serving actually more than 5000 slightly more than 4 or 5 GB) but we stuck on the implementation, and decided to work on this later this year... I&#039;d love to know better some insight, just to not reinvent the wheel :D

Apart from that, I think that wordpress.* is often a notable resource for testing and promoting technologies, and let even us little coders know something new. 

This community workflow is just amazing. Keep up this good work, and thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how you guys managed to have S3 working as primary storage.. some well crafted plugins, some hyperdb-like magic, or something else?</p>
<p>We was thinking about S3 as our new primary storage server (we are serving actually more than 5000 slightly more than 4 or 5 GB) but we stuck on the implementation, and decided to work on this later this year&#8230; I&#8217;d love to know better some insight, just to not reinvent the wheel <img src='http://s.ma.tt/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Apart from that, I think that wordpress.* is often a notable resource for testing and promoting technologies, and let even us little coders know something new. </p>
<p>This community workflow is just amazing. Keep up this good work, and thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byrne Reese</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428335</link>
		<dc:creator>Byrne Reese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 05:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428335</guid>
		<description>Matt, I really respect the transparency you are providing around your financials. Awesome.

I am honestly surprised by the assessment that you are not saving money, especially given SmugMug&#039;s now famous report on how it has saved them money. At the rate Wordpress.com must produce content aren&#039;t you constantly adding more storage? And doesn&#039;t that hardware degrade and depreciate over time?

You are really losing money right? Your AWS bill may have gone up, but surely you are now saving money in other areas right?

Terribly Curious,
Byrne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I really respect the transparency you are providing around your financials. Awesome.</p>
<p>I am honestly surprised by the assessment that you are not saving money, especially given SmugMug&#8217;s now famous report on how it has saved them money. At the rate WordPress.com must produce content aren&#8217;t you constantly adding more storage? And doesn&#8217;t that hardware degrade and depreciate over time?</p>
<p>You are really losing money right? Your AWS bill may have gone up, but surely you are now saving money in other areas right?</p>
<p>Terribly Curious,<br />
Byrne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; links for 2007-10-10</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428334</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; links for 2007-10-10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 05:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428334</guid>
		<description>[...] Photo Matt Â» S3 News &#8220;We&#039;re now using S3 as the primary storage for WordPress.com, rather than just for backups.&#8221; - and people keep telling me it&#8217;s not for anything &#8220;serious&#8221;&#8230; (tags: wordpress.com amazon s3 mattmullenweg varnish) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photo Matt Â» S3 News &#8220;We&#8217;re now using S3 as the primary storage for WordPress.com, rather than just for backups.&#8221; &#8211; and people keep telling me it&#8217;s not for anything &#8220;serious&#8221;&#8230; (tags: wordpress.com amazon s3 mattmullenweg varnish) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darin</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428329</link>
		<dc:creator>Darin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428329</guid>
		<description>wow ... big jump in that price ... but I think in the long run it will help you guys!

Darin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow &#8230; big jump in that price &#8230; but I think in the long run it will help you guys!</p>
<p>Darin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428323</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428323</guid>
		<description>Heliologue, for storage costs they&#039;re hard to beat, but their bandwidth is vastly overpriced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heliologue, for storage costs they&#8217;re hard to beat, but their bandwidth is vastly overpriced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Anderson&#8217;s ITWriting - Tech writing blog &#187; An SLA for Amazon S3</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428320</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Anderson&#8217;s ITWriting - Tech writing blog &#187; An SLA for Amazon S3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428320</guid>
		<description>[...] WordPress is now using S3 as its primary store, but Matt Mullenweg says the SLA means little to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WordPress is now using S3 as its primary store, but Matt Mullenweg says the SLA means little to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2007/10/s3-news/#comment-428318</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photomatt.net/2007/10/09/s3-news/#comment-428318</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In the Amazon newsletter they promoted Content Spooling Network as a good use of their services.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Akismet has caught &lt;strong&gt;232,946 spools&lt;/strong&gt; for you since you first installed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In the Amazon newsletter they promoted Content Spooling Network as a good use of their services.</p></blockquote>
<p>Akismet has caught <strong>232,946 spools</strong> for you since you first installed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

