7 Comments

  • Jeremy February 9, 2008 @ 4:09 pm

    I have used smbfs in the past, but for me, sshfs wins hands-down because it is a FUSE filesystem, meaning you don’t need root privileges to mount it, and because it’s far easier to get SSH going over the internet (you can restrict it to keys only — no passwords) than SMB (security nightmare, no encryption).

    Installation on Debian is as easy as apt-get install sshfs, and adding your user to the group fuse.

    When I first started using sshfs over smbfs, I thought it was going to have absymal performance compared to smbfs, but it handles my streaming H.264 anime just fine. :)

  • Matt February 9, 2008 @ 4:16 pm

    This is for working with a DroboShare on a local network, so SMB is the best and required.

  • arthur February 10, 2008 @ 2:07 pm

    I just switched from NFS to SMB for my home office network. So far so good. Win and Lin are playing nice with the file server, and I hear Mac will too (when it comes!) One of the weirdest things is DW: It keeps thinking the file has been updated on the server, and asks me if I want to reload it. This can happen several times a minute, or not at all for 10-15 mins. DW (MX – latest one to run under CrossOver Office) is the only software going through this tedious exercise in futility (the file has _not_ changed on the source)…

  • Jeremy February 11, 2008 @ 3:09 am

    Arthur, what is “DW”?

    I know the abbreviation will probably come to me 5 seconds after I post this comment, but may not for others.

  • Jeremy February 11, 2008 @ 3:11 am

    Duh — of course. DreamWeaver! I knew it would come to me.

  • Jauhari February 11, 2008 @ 3:21 pm

    Let’s me try this tutorial ;)

  • Stephan February 12, 2008 @ 8:24 am

    smb and fuse is possible: fusesmb [1] is a package which lets you mount the whole “network neigbourhood”, just like windows showed it.
    [1]http://packages.debian.org/search?lang=en&suite=etch&arch=any&mode=path&searchon=contents&keywords=fusesmb

Share Your Thoughts