<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Theme Revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/</link>
	<description>Unlucky in Cards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 13:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta4-20941</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The WordPress GPL Timeline &#124; WPCandy</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-484523</link>
		<dc:creator>The WordPress GPL Timeline &#124; WPCandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-484523</guid>
		<description>[...] http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/" rel="nofollow">http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-470591</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-470591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m 100% certain all Brian&#039;s themes are licensed under the GPL. That doesn&#039;t mean he has to offer them free for download on his site -- they&#039;re different things you should read the conversations around this and a FAQ about the GPL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m 100% certain all Brian&#8217;s themes are licensed under the GPL. That doesn&#8217;t mean he has to offer them free for download on his site &#8212; they&#8217;re different things you should read the conversations around this and a FAQ about the GPL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-470583</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-470583</guid>
		<description>Once opened as GPL only while he was redesigning his new themes, just to cause a rush of excitement and as a publicity stunt. Brian Gardner has fooled us all...

His themes are decent and well polished, but to open source themes and then revert them back to commercial only is a stab in the back to the very community that has supported him all this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once opened as GPL only while he was redesigning his new themes, just to cause a rush of excitement and as a publicity stunt. Brian Gardner has fooled us all&#8230;</p>
<p>His themes are decent and well polished, but to open source themes and then revert them back to commercial only is a stab in the back to the very community that has supported him all this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluecorn</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-461497</link>
		<dc:creator>bluecorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-461497</guid>
		<description>yes, I admit I&#039;m disappointed at all the work I&#039;ve had to do to figure out what&#039;s going on. Thanks for spelling it out Daily and others in these comments.

All Brian Gardner&#039;s latest themes are commercial, and the countless links across the web and saturating google all now redirect and funnel to the Studiopress commercial theme-selling site.

However, there is one free theme now at WordPress, it&#039;s called Revolution Code Blue, and it&#039;s pretty decent for a free theme I guess, but it&#039;s VERY stripped of features compared to the $60 themes for sale.

I suppose the one free theme qualifies as something in the way of good karma - but the massive litter across the web of false information is a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, I admit I&#8217;m disappointed at all the work I&#8217;ve had to do to figure out what&#8217;s going on. Thanks for spelling it out Daily and others in these comments.</p>
<p>All Brian Gardner&#8217;s latest themes are commercial, and the countless links across the web and saturating google all now redirect and funnel to the Studiopress commercial theme-selling site.</p>
<p>However, there is one free theme now at WordPress, it&#8217;s called Revolution Code Blue, and it&#8217;s pretty decent for a free theme I guess, but it&#8217;s VERY stripped of features compared to the $60 themes for sale.</p>
<p>I suppose the one free theme qualifies as something in the way of good karma &#8211; but the massive litter across the web of false information is a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-458416</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-458416</guid>
		<description>How they are fully GPL? I don&#039;t see a link to download the theme for free, I must pay for &quot;support&quot;  in order to get the theme.  
He never complied with GPL with the whole revolution series and now that his &quot;going GPL marketing stunt&quot; didn&#039;t work he rebranded and is charging again and  is featured on the Theme directory. 
 
Can you explain a little better how they are fully GPL? 
 
Thanks </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How they are fully GPL? I don&#039;t see a link to download the theme for free, I must pay for &quot;support&quot;  in order to get the theme.<br />
He never complied with GPL with the whole revolution series and now that his &quot;going GPL marketing stunt&quot; didn&#039;t work he rebranded and is charging again and  is featured on the Theme directory. </p>
<p>Can you explain a little better how they are fully GPL? </p>
<p>Thanks </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-456978</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-456978</guid>
		<description>They might be under GPL lisence, but I do understand entirely that people get angry after first going open source and to totally free themes and then just after a month or two switching back to paid model and just say it was an momentarily experiment. NoRevolutions comment is not the first comment of dissappointed/angry people. I found many while searching an explanation...

Anyway I don&#039;t think this kind site promotion is considered good marketing and here is why:

1) You could argue that this is a textbook case of stealth marketing (guerilla marketing gone bad)
- get people interested
- get the media hype
- get the buzz efect
- hand out free samples

One of the keypoints of guerilla marketing is that ultimately marketer must deliver the goods. And this isn&#039;t the case anymore since at launch the the site was profiled with free dowload themes and this is better explained in my second point. 

2) Some SEO specialists would call this kind of stealth marketing Blackhat SEO. Providing first free material and get the link coverage needed to get good ranks and then switch to totally paid content. If you search for keywords like: revolution 2, wordpress, theme, free, open source. You get hundreds of blog posts and referral links pointing to free download themes site. This is how revolutiontwo.com got most its link coverage.

Try to google about the announcement of the new paid model or even find it on a current website. There actually isn&#039;t any explanation on the current website, the announcement is on Brians own blog (http://www.briangardner.com/blog/kicking-off-2009-a-bit-early.htm). Yet rather than posting a proper announcement to a current site for people asking more info in the comment boxes, he emails a link to his own site (http://www.revolutiontwo.com/blog/chrome-20-theme-released.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1286).

So I think most of the angry/dissapointed posts come from expecting free dowloads as told by search engines and lots of blog posts and getting something else without an explanation. Not because of the change of business model.

Maybe all this wasn&#039;t made intentionally, but I think the switch could have been made better.

P.S. Maybe this wasn&#039;t the best blog to post this comment, but it was NoRevolutions comment that made me finally post a comment about this matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They might be under GPL lisence, but I do understand entirely that people get angry after first going open source and to totally free themes and then just after a month or two switching back to paid model and just say it was an momentarily experiment. NoRevolutions comment is not the first comment of dissappointed/angry people. I found many while searching an explanation&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway I don&#8217;t think this kind site promotion is considered good marketing and here is why:</p>
<p>1) You could argue that this is a textbook case of stealth marketing (guerilla marketing gone bad)<br />
- get people interested<br />
- get the media hype<br />
- get the buzz efect<br />
- hand out free samples</p>
<p>One of the keypoints of guerilla marketing is that ultimately marketer must deliver the goods. And this isn&#8217;t the case anymore since at launch the the site was profiled with free dowload themes and this is better explained in my second point. </p>
<p>2) Some SEO specialists would call this kind of stealth marketing Blackhat SEO. Providing first free material and get the link coverage needed to get good ranks and then switch to totally paid content. If you search for keywords like: revolution 2, wordpress, theme, free, open source. You get hundreds of blog posts and referral links pointing to free download themes site. This is how revolutiontwo.com got most its link coverage.</p>
<p>Try to google about the announcement of the new paid model or even find it on a current website. There actually isn&#8217;t any explanation on the current website, the announcement is on Brians own blog (<a href="http://www.briangardner.com/blog/kicking-off-2009-a-bit-early.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.briangardner.com/blog/kicking-off-2009-a-bit-early.htm</a>). Yet rather than posting a proper announcement to a current site for people asking more info in the comment boxes, he emails a link to his own site (<a href="http://www.revolutiontwo.com/blog/chrome-20-theme-released.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1286" rel="nofollow">http://www.revolutiontwo.com/blog/chrome-20-theme-released.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1286</a>).</p>
<p>So I think most of the angry/dissapointed posts come from expecting free dowloads as told by search engines and lots of blog posts and getting something else without an explanation. Not because of the change of business model.</p>
<p>Maybe all this wasn&#8217;t made intentionally, but I think the switch could have been made better.</p>
<p>P.S. Maybe this wasn&#8217;t the best blog to post this comment, but it was NoRevolutions comment that made me finally post a comment about this matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-456927</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-456927</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re still fully GPL, everything they do is licensed under the GPL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re still fully GPL, everything they do is licensed under the GPL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoRevolution</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-456918</link>
		<dc:creator>NoRevolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-456918</guid>
		<description>Well, looks like the GPL model ain&#039;t working and they switched back to the commercial model. So why do they get to show their banner at http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/ ?

Either kick them out or allow commercial themes in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, looks like the GPL model ain&#8217;t working and they switched back to the commercial model. So why do they get to show their banner at <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/</a> ?</p>
<p>Either kick them out or allow commercial themes in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carter</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-455251</link>
		<dc:creator>Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-455251</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt:

There is no setup guide with themes and I have to purchase the support to know how to set them up.  Do you think this is right?  Revolution team seems to have used the &quot;Open Source&quot; words to become famous.

You can see that there is even necessary plugins missing with the new update.  Just go to revolutiontwo site, download a theme, and see.  Without a basic setup guide, how one can use them.  It is nonsense.

Regards,
Carter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt:</p>
<p>There is no setup guide with themes and I have to purchase the support to know how to set them up.  Do you think this is right?  Revolution team seems to have used the &#8220;Open Source&#8221; words to become famous.</p>
<p>You can see that there is even necessary plugins missing with the new update.  Just go to revolutiontwo site, download a theme, and see.  Without a basic setup guide, how one can use them.  It is nonsense.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Carter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-453222</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-453222</guid>
		<description>As a Revolution user I have to say that the support provided by Brian is, perhaps, the best support I&#039;ve ever seen.  We implemented Revolution over basically a weekend with lots of help in the forum and I don&#039;t think I ever waited more than an hour for an answer!  It was awesome!.

I have no idea what shoemoney is talking about above.  There is nothing shady about Brian or the Revolution theme that I have seen.  And as Brian has pointed out, the existing Revolution themes that people have paid for will be gone forever.  The NEW Revolution will be released under GPL, not the existing themes.  At least that&#039;s how I understood his announcement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Revolution user I have to say that the support provided by Brian is, perhaps, the best support I&#8217;ve ever seen.  We implemented Revolution over basically a weekend with lots of help in the forum and I don&#8217;t think I ever waited more than an hour for an answer!  It was awesome!.</p>
<p>I have no idea what shoemoney is talking about above.  There is nothing shady about Brian or the Revolution theme that I have seen.  And as Brian has pointed out, the existing Revolution themes that people have paid for will be gone forever.  The NEW Revolution will be released under GPL, not the existing themes.  At least that&#8217;s how I understood his announcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert MacEwan</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-452518</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert MacEwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-452518</guid>
		<description>I have 10 years of desktop and server experience with Linux. Watching this delicate dance is always fascinating to watch. My guess would be that you will not be able to embed encoded links to either advertisers or the developers page. Along the same idea of only providing a *.bin file for use on Linux (show me the source).

This will ruffle feathers from the folks that set up shop to make a buck off the affiliate sales or development fees. If you know of an uproar discussion going on please send me a link.

Below are a couple of articles to read to get an understanding of what this talk is all about.

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
Basic questions about the GNU Project, the Free Software Foundation, and its licenses

http://lwn.net/Articles/61292/
The GPL Is a License, not a Contract</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 10 years of desktop and server experience with Linux. Watching this delicate dance is always fascinating to watch. My guess would be that you will not be able to embed encoded links to either advertisers or the developers page. Along the same idea of only providing a *.bin file for use on Linux (show me the source).</p>
<p>This will ruffle feathers from the folks that set up shop to make a buck off the affiliate sales or development fees. If you know of an uproar discussion going on please send me a link.</p>
<p>Below are a couple of articles to read to get an understanding of what this talk is all about.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html</a><br />
Basic questions about the GNU Project, the Free Software Foundation, and its licenses</p>
<p><a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/61292/" rel="nofollow">http://lwn.net/Articles/61292/</a><br />
The GPL Is a License, not a Contract</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert MacEwan</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-452516</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert MacEwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-452516</guid>
		<description>@Drew Strojny, That is one hell of a fast response theme. Nice work.

@Shoemoney, That was my first thought too. What about those that purchased the developer packages?

The folks that set up affiliate sites to promote these themes will suffer. Those that set up advertising campaigns will be affected.

Other than that I do think this is a positive direction, but I will still pay for premium services regardless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Drew Strojny, That is one hell of a fast response theme. Nice work.</p>
<p>@Shoemoney, That was my first thought too. What about those that purchased the developer packages?</p>
<p>The folks that set up affiliate sites to promote these themes will suffer. Those that set up advertising campaigns will be affected.</p>
<p>Other than that I do think this is a positive direction, but I will still pay for premium services regardless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arghhh</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-452368</link>
		<dc:creator>arghhh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 12:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-452368</guid>
		<description>Hi! What a move :)

Personally, I&#039;m happy to hear that because I, as a &quot;normal&quot; theme developer, am pretty sure that I could learn very much if I could take a look inside such kind of Revolution&#039;s flavored themes.

But I&#039;m thinking a couple of things and I would like to know if I&#039;m wrong (what is highly possible) or not.

Fact: WordPress is released under GPL license and that license means that every software that make use of all or part of WordPress MUST use the same GPL.

Questions, thoughts:

GPL is related to &quot;Free Software&quot; but that &quot;Free&quot; word doesn&#039;t means (necessarily) &quot;free of charge&quot; but (always) free of &quot;freedom&quot;. As far as I know the GPL *just* implies that the user who use a GPL software MUST have access to the source code. So, if you buy a &quot;Premium Theme&quot; (paying for it) and you have full access to the source code and you can fully modify it, the theme developer *is* honoring the GPL at all.

And, what if... the theme developer builds his own set of queries, caches, template tags and everything he needs for the theme to work? He won&#039;t use anything of WordPress as software for the theme itself (the theme, with or without GPL must be taken as software too). In fact, wordPress will be using the theme... isn&#039;t it? Could the developer use a different license than GPL in this case?

Anyway, I&#039;m happy and expecting the new set of GPL Rev&#039; Themes.

I wish you the best, Brian!! (and Jason too ;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! What a move <img src='http://s.ma.tt/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;m happy to hear that because I, as a &#8220;normal&#8221; theme developer, am pretty sure that I could learn very much if I could take a look inside such kind of Revolution&#8217;s flavored themes.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m thinking a couple of things and I would like to know if I&#8217;m wrong (what is highly possible) or not.</p>
<p>Fact: WordPress is released under GPL license and that license means that every software that make use of all or part of WordPress MUST use the same GPL.</p>
<p>Questions, thoughts:</p>
<p>GPL is related to &#8220;Free Software&#8221; but that &#8220;Free&#8221; word doesn&#8217;t means (necessarily) &#8220;free of charge&#8221; but (always) free of &#8220;freedom&#8221;. As far as I know the GPL *just* implies that the user who use a GPL software MUST have access to the source code. So, if you buy a &#8220;Premium Theme&#8221; (paying for it) and you have full access to the source code and you can fully modify it, the theme developer *is* honoring the GPL at all.</p>
<p>And, what if&#8230; the theme developer builds his own set of queries, caches, template tags and everything he needs for the theme to work? He won&#8217;t use anything of WordPress as software for the theme itself (the theme, with or without GPL must be taken as software too). In fact, wordPress will be using the theme&#8230; isn&#8217;t it? Could the developer use a different license than GPL in this case?</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m happy and expecting the new set of GPL Rev&#8217; Themes.</p>
<p>I wish you the best, Brian!! (and Jason too <img src='http://s.ma.tt/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio Guglielmino</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-452184</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio Guglielmino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-452184</guid>
		<description>This is a really good news.This are really stunning Themes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really good news.This are really stunning Themes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThemeBin</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-452133</link>
		<dc:creator>ThemeBin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 09:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-452133</guid>
		<description>Thats really great! way to go :)

I wish all WP themes to be free when WP itself is free :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats really great! way to go <img src='http://s.ma.tt/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I wish all WP themes to be free when WP itself is free <img src='http://s.ma.tt/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Equal Design</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-452124</link>
		<dc:creator>Equal Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-452124</guid>
		<description>An excellent move is going open source.  The Revolution themes are truly outstanding.  Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent move is going open source.  The Revolution themes are truly outstanding.  Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu McLaren</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-452121</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu McLaren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-452121</guid>
		<description>@Brian - I commend you my friend b/c I&#039;ve only heard good comments from people across the web.  

You&#039;ve certainly given the rest of us lots to think about :)

The reason for my question above is to generate conversation on the topic of building a business around WordPress and yet still aligning the foundation of that business with the Open Source model.

Just curious about the model more than anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian &#8211; I commend you my friend b/c I&#8217;ve only heard good comments from people across the web.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;ve certainly given the rest of us lots to think about <img src='http://s.ma.tt/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The reason for my question above is to generate conversation on the topic of building a business around WordPress and yet still aligning the foundation of that business with the Open Source model.</p>
<p>Just curious about the model more than anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Dahlberg</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-452113</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Dahlberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 08:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-452113</guid>
		<description>Matt, thanks for taking the time to chat at Wordcamp Utah (and taking my mugshot!) and for sharing your thoughts on the premium themes market. It totally changed my way of looking at it - and from a designer perspective it&#039;s GPL themes for me from here on out. peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, thanks for taking the time to chat at Wordcamp Utah (and taking my mugshot!) and for sharing your thoughts on the premium themes market. It totally changed my way of looking at it &#8211; and from a designer perspective it&#8217;s GPL themes for me from here on out. peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Belt</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-452093</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-452093</guid>
		<description>In think Brian is taking an amazing risk here, but WOW, am I impressed.  As a current Revolution theme owner, I look forward to seeing how this plays out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In think Brian is taking an amazing risk here, but WOW, am I impressed.  As a current Revolution theme owner, I look forward to seeing how this plays out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Gardner</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-452089</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-452089</guid>
		<description>We live in a free-will world, so we’re all entitled to make our own decisions. What we did was a response of what we feel is best for our business. Like I&#039;ve said before, Jason and I didn’t want to continue our current models, as we felt that there were potentially built on sand and not rock. Which is why we flew out to San Francisco to discuss this with Matt and Toni. As for the direction that the current premium theme model goes - that is not for me to decide - rather for the premium theme designers out there. This is the direction we are heading, and if others follow suit, so be it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We live in a free-will world, so we’re all entitled to make our own decisions. What we did was a response of what we feel is best for our business. Like I&#8217;ve said before, Jason and I didn’t want to continue our current models, as we felt that there were potentially built on sand and not rock. Which is why we flew out to San Francisco to discuss this with Matt and Toni. As for the direction that the current premium theme model goes &#8211; that is not for me to decide &#8211; rather for the premium theme designers out there. This is the direction we are heading, and if others follow suit, so be it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu McLaren</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-452075</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu McLaren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-452075</guid>
		<description>This move certainly does shake up the premium theme market but I it makes me wonder a couple of things...

Is it smarter business model to &quot;give away the premium theme and charge for support&quot; vs. &quot;charge for the theme and give free support&quot;?

Certainly Brian&#039;s move indicates this maybe the case.

The other thing to think about is how this fits with selling themes/plugins to the WordPress community.  

Does this mean that people who are able to build a business producing and selling high end products to WordPress users are looked down upon?

Thoughts anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This move certainly does shake up the premium theme market but I it makes me wonder a couple of things&#8230;</p>
<p>Is it smarter business model to &#8220;give away the premium theme and charge for support&#8221; vs. &#8220;charge for the theme and give free support&#8221;?</p>
<p>Certainly Brian&#8217;s move indicates this maybe the case.</p>
<p>The other thing to think about is how this fits with selling themes/plugins to the WordPress community.  </p>
<p>Does this mean that people who are able to build a business producing and selling high end products to WordPress users are looked down upon?</p>
<p>Thoughts anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-452066</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-452066</guid>
		<description>Shoemoney, your comment shows that you don&#039;t really know what&#039;s going on. So why advertise the fact?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shoemoney, your comment shows that you don&#8217;t really know what&#8217;s going on. So why advertise the fact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Sabin-Wilson</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-452058</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Sabin-Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-452058</guid>
		<description>Truly awesome move, Brian - kudos!  It will be interesting to see how this shakes things up.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly awesome move, Brian &#8211; kudos!  It will be interesting to see how this shakes things up.  <img src='http://s.ma.tt/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Gardner</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-452054</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-452054</guid>
		<description>Jeremy, if you read the post you&#039;ll see that I am not moving the existing themes over to the new site, in order to preserve their value. And if you read the comments on my announcement post, you&#039;ll see the overall response and mood of my community isn&#039;t shady, rather positive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy, if you read the post you&#8217;ll see that I am not moving the existing themes over to the new site, in order to preserve their value. And if you read the comments on my announcement post, you&#8217;ll see the overall response and mood of my community isn&#8217;t shady, rather positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hello Kitty</title>
		<link>http://ma.tt/2008/10/theme-revolution/#comment-452048</link>
		<dc:creator>Hello Kitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ma.tt/?p=7891#comment-452048</guid>
		<description>Thank you Matt! And specially thanks and respect to Brian Gardner. Revolution is great! It&#039;s wonderful that such premium theme is free now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Matt! And specially thanks and respect to Brian Gardner. Revolution is great! It&#8217;s wonderful that such premium theme is free now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

