I thought I could skip this one, but have been getting lots of ribbing on the NY Times Bachelorville article that was in their style section yesterday. To answer the FAQs: 1. My eyes are not always red. 2. Dvorak really is a thing. 3. I, too, had to look up what they meant by “unreconstructed.”
7 thoughts on “Bachelorville”
So, you never reconciled the outcome of the civil war. I guess that’s not really a crime when you’re from Texas…
I know, right? NY Times hates Texans. 😉
hahaha nice read! well it pays not to be bright and a billionaire/millionaire for i can live without being the target of people who think dvorak is just speed thing, well there is vertical mouse too but it’s famous user another matt is married (think) but he never wrote anything about it, all he ever posts his his cat and stuff!
take cover kids for they are hunting for you! it’s wild wild west out there!
Funny article. Oh, to be described as a “young, bright, wildly overcompensated hyper-achiever” by the New York Times! Hadn’t heard of Change.org but we have something similar in Australia called ‘Getup’ which has done many great things. It’s great when business and altruism coincide.
Don’t you think the NYTimes could’ve retouched the red-eye?
It amuses me that if you highlight and query ‘unreconstructed geek’ you get a ‘the word you’re looking for is not in our dictionary’ error.
That Dvorak link was fascinating! Two things on my Someday List now: Esperanto and Dvorak 😉