Yesterday in the African bush was great, I saw giraffes, zebras, warthogs, leopard turtles, elephants. Today wasn’t great: I witnessed a rhino shot with a tranquilizer from a helicopter, then it was held down, had its horns cut off, and then shaved down. I have some photos and videos from the event but I’m not going to share them, because I think it’s really tragic. While this was happening I put my hand on the rhino’s belly to try to send it love, because I can’t imagine how confusing and terrifying the experience was.
Let’s back up: Why does anyone care about rhino horns? First, you have to start with how dangerous false ideas and memes can be. Rhino horns are 92-95% keratin, just like your fingernails, the rest is basic stuff like melanin, calcium salts, magnesium, sulfur, nitrogen, amino acids, and phosphorus. There is nothing special or magic about a rhino horn that you couldn’t easily obtain many other ways.
However there is a dangerous infovirus going back thousands of years that rhino horns can cure various ailments, from cancer to fevers, and have aphrodisiac properties. To quote Scientific American:
Some purchase horn chunks or powder for traditional medicinal purposes, to ingest or to give others as an impressive gift. Wealthy buyers bid for antique rhino horn carvings such as cups or figurines to display or as investments. A modern market for rhino horn necklaces, bracelets and beads has also sprung up. […]
On the bright side, traditional Chinese medicine experts have increasingly joined the fight to reduce the demand for rhino horn. When China officially banned the international trade in 1993, it followed up by removing rhino horn as a medical ingredient in traditional Chinese medicine’s pharmacopeia and curriculum. […]
“Traditional Chinese medicine has a history of 3,000 years and we have been educating the public for less than 30 years,” Huang notes. “Therefore this is an ongoing education.”
Regardless of the reasons, there is a price for rhino horns. I was told the larger front horn would get about $300,000 on the black market, and rhinos have been poached to near-extinction. Combine that with South Africa’s 33% unemployment rate, some people turn to crime or poaching to make money. It’s cheaper and faster to kill the rhino and take its horn than tranquilize it as the game reserve did.
I don’t want to criticize the people at the game reserve. They clearly cared for the animal quite deeply, and while it was tranquilized, they provided other veterinary help for it, like removing ticks. They also put a tracker on its foot. They say they lock the horns in a vault… why? Burn it, toss it. The thinking is that reserves that are known for de-horning will attract fewer poachers.
This is obviously a middle solution, and I hope ten years from now we’ll look back at this as a point in time we learned from. On the demand side, it seems like aggressive education campaigns could help decrease demand for keratin from rhinos. On the anti-poacher side, I think drones will be able to secure perimeters far more securely than fences currently do. It would be fascinating for an economist like Tyler Cowen to dive into these issues.
You’re not wrong, an aggressive education campaign would certainly have helped, sadly no one thought it was important enough, until it was too late.
Texas A&M is working on a project to decrease demand for rhino horns by making them radioactive (without hurting the rhino.) https://today.tamu.edu/2024/07/29/radioactive-rhinoceros-horns-may-deter-poaching/
A couple of thoughts on this:
1. Drones currently are being used by the anti-poaching units… I’ve heard they are intentionally not publicised so that
1.1 Poachers know less about their abilities and limitations and
1.2 Some of the use of drones are in legal grey-areas, parks can span across international borders, they can be on government, community and privately owned land which complicates matters.
1.3 The areas of the parks are truly massive… Kruger National Park is around the size of Wales – both fences and drones are logistically challenging
2. Putting my Tyler Cowen hat on:
2.1 Demand: If the Black market rate for rhino horn is $300,000 we have a long way to go to reducing demand for Rhino horn. Education might help, but even if this price dropped to $10,000 there would still be a market for poaching
2.2 Supply: “They say they lock the horns in a vault” – On of the proposed solutions is to build up a supply of rhino horn to potentially legalise the sale and flood the market to increase supply and drop the price below the demand for poaching.
I’m not sure how I feel about legalising the trade, but I do like the optionality that storing the rhino horns gives us, we can burn them in the future if we want.
Agreed, education would be vital in any initiative but it’s a complex and worldwide issue. Though I hope we do, we may never be able to do enough education to completely remove a black market.
Improved security is definitely a good approach but also alternative methods of deterring may help. The Rhisotope Project (rhisotope.org) through the Wits University have proved that using radio isotopes inserted in a horn are safe and can be detected at nuclear material detection points across worldwide ports of entry. Without removing a horn you can instead detect poached horns, identify routes, and even make the end product more undesirable.
Very exciting research and could be an amazing tool alongside better reserve security.