Well, I was going to write a javascript function that changed the background image to achieve the same result. But I was at work so that’d be wasting a little too much time (like this is now).
Seems rather pointless to use CSS3 selectors — after all, it’s just a single element with one ID. If anything using the ‘starts-with’ selector makes the browser work harder for something #www-mozilla.org #firefox-feature would do just as well.
Colour me clueless…but I can’t for the life of me see what the hell was changed. Makes no sense to me at all. Dang, I gotta cut down on the medications… 🙂
Well, I was going to write a javascript function that changed the background image to achieve the same result. But I was at work so that’d be wasting a little too much time (like this is now).
Thanks for the plug, man. I think I’ll go watch my traffic explode.
Seems rather pointless to use CSS3 selectors — after all, it’s just a single element with one ID. If anything using the ‘starts-with’ selector makes the browser work harder for something #www-mozilla.org #firefox-feature would do just as well.
Unless I’m missing something?
Colour me clueless…but I can’t for the life of me see what the hell was changed. Makes no sense to me at all. Dang, I gotta cut down on the medications… 🙂
DOH! I see now! Sigh…I’m just a little slow on the uptake at 4:22AM! 🙂
Justin: Ah, I see where you’re getting at. I made a mistake in that I was thinking about both IDs and classes. Off to edit.