Phil checks out MT license. Aren’t most software licenses similarly gross and nasty? I suspect most of this was from a template of some sort. I read a Microsoft EULA once and had nightmares for weeks. The GPL isn’t bad. ¶
3 Responses
Share your thoughts
You should follow me on twitter here.
And on Facebook here.
Recent Essays
Projects
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- More...
Mark | May 20th, 2004 @ 8:56 am |
Actually, the GPL is pretty complex around the edges. But it’s relatively well-understood by now, since it hasn’t changed in 13 years.
Scott Johnson | May 20th, 2004 @ 11:01 am |
Gosh, when Phil puts it into perspective, 6A begins to look like (*shudder*) Microsoft! I hope they get these issues clarified ASAP. Nobody in their right mind would want to purchase software with a license like that. I have nothing against that company and have no problem with buying their software, but I won’t use software with such an insane license.
Matt | May 20th, 2004 @ 12:16 pm |
Mark, granted.
Scott, you probably use software with much worse licenses than that every day.