Now with Twice the “Mattic†– Matt Thomas joins Automattic full-time. We’re still figuring out what to call him, since “Matt” is obviously taken.
¶
Now with Twice the “Mattic†– Matt Thomas joins Automattic full-time. We’re still figuring out what to call him, since “Matt” is obviously taken.
¶
Abhijit Nadgouda | November 22nd, 2006 @ 5:47 am |
Automattic is going strong in blogging matters. Doublematt will make it stronger. You should have named Wordpress as Wordmatt or Mattpress
Diego MartÃn Lafuente | November 22nd, 2006 @ 6:41 am |
In Spain we usually say: “Matu”
Alistair | November 22nd, 2006 @ 7:03 am |
How about Mattwo, Mattou or Mattu!
Al.
Chris Harrison | November 22nd, 2006 @ 7:18 am |
Well, having a common name is definitely a problem. As a “Chris”, I would know… In my case, if there is more than one Chris in an office, one invariable gets called Chris, while the other gets called Christopher (or something). Might go with Matt and Matthew, Big Matt & Little Matt, New Matt & Old Matt… umm, WelcomeMatt and Mattress… I dunno…
Darren Chamberlain | November 22nd, 2006 @ 8:13 am |
I used to work for a place that had a similar problem with Mikes and Marcs. When we got our second Mike, we (arbitrarily) decided to start calling him Joe, and by the time we got our third Marc, we started simply indexing them — he was known as “three”.
Aaron Brazell | November 22nd, 2006 @ 9:21 am |
What do you call a boy with no arms and no legs in front of a door?
Matt.
Which means, you can call him “Stumpy”
Emily | November 22nd, 2006 @ 9:24 am |
Isn’t it obvious? He should be Matt2 (or MattToo, if you’d rather)
Thomas Tallyce | November 22nd, 2006 @ 10:21 am |
MT?
Or is that too ironic?
Bill Brown | November 22nd, 2006 @ 12:36 pm |
Jamie.
mariano | November 22nd, 2006 @ 3:51 pm |
you´re getting the best team around
What will he design?
Adam | November 22nd, 2006 @ 5:31 pm |
I think ‘Thommo’ is the obvious choice.
Jules | November 22nd, 2006 @ 6:45 pm |
Here’s an idea. Combine what Diego suggested, Matu with the fact that Matt is the second and you get Matt2.
Felixe | November 22nd, 2006 @ 7:01 pm |
I think MattM and MattT would do the trick.
AM Putra | November 22nd, 2006 @ 7:36 pm |
Just call him O-Thom-Matt
Rico | November 22nd, 2006 @ 10:16 pm |
How about “Mat,” with one “T”?
Dan | November 23rd, 2006 @ 2:15 am |
TOMattic of course.
Aaron Brazell | November 23rd, 2006 @ 8:33 am |
Thomas definitely gets the vote for the best suggestion.